True Humanity (Criticism Of Lord Of The Flies)
Checking Out Lord of the Flies, one gets rather an impression of Golding’s view on human nature. Whether this view is ideal or wrong, true or not, is a point to be debated. This image Golding paints for the reader, that of humans being naturally bad, is a point of view not all individuals share. This viewpoint, in reality, is a point that lots of have disagreed with when reading his work. There are many instances throughout Lord of the Flies that specify Golding’s opinion recommending a wicked human nature. Each of these circumstances are the bricks holding together his fortress of concepts that are continuously under attack.
Lord of the Flies is however an abstract tool of Golding’s to build the concept of human nature in the minds of his readers. Throughout the novel, it is stated that all human beings are wicked. It is said that this evil is inescapable and will turn everybody evil. At one point in the book, when the Lord of the Flies is representing all evil, this theory is stated as, “The Lord of the Flies was broadening like a balloon” (Golding 130). Together with this idea is the spiritual meaning that is utilized for ineffectively confronting the evil.
At a point in the book, Golding has Simon, symbolic f Jesus Christ (a Christian deity), confront the Lord of the Flies. This is a pig’s head on a stick that is thought of to talk and represent the evil in all humans. Simon tries to act and spread out the understanding of this evil to others however is killed. This is a direct referral to the death of Christ, alluding to the Holy Bible.
At many points throughout Lord of the Flies, Golding composes for the characters to become gradually increasingly more wicked. This characteristic even reaches the signs of goodness and order, such as Ralph. When, when Ralph and Piggy go to the feast on Jack’s beach, they start to meld with the others and their evil ways. Piggy and Ralph, under the danger of the sky, found themselves excited to take a place in this demented but partially safe and secure society” (Golding 138). This really just proves their common yearning for a location with others, not any depth of evilness.
Golding likewise has all of the characters eventually take part in the hunts, his representation of an evil ritual that humans carry out. By having all of the characters practice this, he highlights his belief of everyone being vulnerable to turning evil. This reality is not necessarily true. Human beings establish their own dedications to their own beliefs, morals, and ethics.
Each person has the choice of acting how they wish. Lots of acts are considered “bad” by the judgment body of federal government and are punishable. Other acts are considered “good” and are rewarded. However, it must be seen that each individual decides for himself what is “excellent” or “bad” for him to do. Therefore, most people act upon what they think about good. This can appear unusual, for a serial killer may consider brutal murder a great act and helping a friend as an exceptionally evil action. One need to see, that some individuals likewise act on what they think about bad. This may be as a rebellion of all that was forced on them by society.
It may likewise be because of overwhelming circumstances too. But, it is still apparent that each person has the option of acting on their own goodness or evil. Golding likewise makes it clear that the island that is the focus of the book is merely a microcosm of the whole world. He develops his world as one having a devastating nuclear war. This is meant to show that everyone, no matter who or where, will turn evil. He paints the image of nuclear war as pure and vile evil. This is not entirely, or at all, real. A nuclear war could merely be a power battle that has mass power behind it.
It might also be the removal of those who oppose what is thought about “excellent.” Anyhow, the way Golding shows and terms lots of things in Lord of the Flies develops a big and almost impenetrable illusion to support his claim of the wicked humanity. No one thing can be all evil or completely anti-good. Many things can be usually bad or primarily considered bad, but there is some good to be discovered in everyone. One must not be mistaken, though, that anything could be all excellent either. All individuals, actions, and things have the possible to be neutral. This can quickly be sustained. It can also be tipped to favor great or advertisement, however nothing is simply one or the other.
As shown above, Golding has a misguided view of all humans being bad. This can not be, for absolutely nothing can be entirely excellent or bad. When considering this, one need to also bear in mind that each person had his own awareness, therefore has the ability to choose. This likewise uses to great and bad actions. If one does mostly good actions, they may be considered good. If one does mainly bad actions, they might be considered bad. This should be kept in mind when thinking of humanity, instead of some twisted concept of everyone being uncontrollably bad.