The Odyssey Book vs Film Variation
In our world of sophisticated technology, we enjoy to enjoy motion pictures more than we love to read. Being in front of a flat-screen TV while eating popcorn and drinking soda would sound a lot more attractive than checking out a book by the fire at night while consuming a frappucino from Starbucks. Now, manufacturers and directors would take effective and popular stories and adapt it into a film. In some cases, they would succeed, with examples being the Harry Potter series, which received generally positive evaluations from both critics and the audience.
However, most of the time these individuals would unconsciously butcher the book based film by getting many crucial characters and events, with fine examples being The Lightning Burglar and Eragon. Then another example of a butchered book, or impressive in this case, is The Odyssey, written by Homer. It tells the story of a king named Odysseus who is cursed by the Olympian gods to wander the land for 10 years and be not able to go back to his beloved city called Ithaca. Throughout his ten years of wander, he arrive on the island of the Cyclopes and unintentionally dooms the majority of his guys to a fearsome Cyclops named Polyphemus, the boy of Poseidon.
In my opinion, I think that the book version of Book IX in The Odyssey is much better than the movie version. Whenever we see a motion picture based upon a book we checked out, we expect it to be simply as excellent as the book. In the film variation of Book IX in The Odyssey, Polyphemus eats only 2 males (technically we don’t see Antiphous get consumed, but it is implied that he is), contradicting the storyline which states that he ate six guys before Odysseus could form a strategy to escape. Next, Polyphemus does not look as intimidating as we believed him to be.
Instead of seeing a shaggy giant a minimum of 100 feet tall, the audience sees a hairless tall man with just one eye who can consume only one man before dropping off to sleep. Then, we anticipated to see Odysseus teasing and angering Polyphemus with numerous insults and taunts, yet we see and hear just one taunt. Additionally, since Polyphemus is so enormous, we wanted to see him tear off the suggestion of a mountain then toss it at the escaping ship. Yet, we see him get a small stone and toss it at Odysseus- which misses by a minimum of 20 feet.
Finally, when Polyphemus consumes the unlucky soldier, he turns away from the cam, as if he does not want us to see the feasted on guy. After around 50 bashes against the ground, the victim winds up just losing a head. After Polyphemus stops slamming the guy, the audience would have expected the victim to lose more than a head and an unharmed body. Maybe they anticipated a broken body with bones protruding and blood running down the body with its innards.
Pertinent Topics Readers Also Choose
- Role Of Females In The Odyssey
Seeing Polyphemus as only 20 feet tall and not that strong as a Cyclops would not have actually fulfilled their expectations since they consider a hairy mountain with one eye that can squash a tank with his bare hands. They would not have anticipated a hairless giant with one eye that can eat only one man before being complete. That is not part of the description of a terrifying mythological creature like the Cyclopes. Expectations of a movie based upon a book are always high, yet the manufacturers never ever add in the best parts in the book, a good example being the part where Polyphemus speak to the leading ram Odysseus is under, since that develops lots of thriller.
All in all, when a book-based motion picture comes out in theaters, we desire it to be as legendary, awesome, and excellent as the book it was based on. In both the motion picture and the book, sensations of thriller rise within us, specifically when checking out or seeing The Odyssey. For example, in Book IX of The Odyssey, when Polyphemus is touching and speaking with the leading ram, we are filled with suspense. What happens if Polyphemus finds that Odysseus is concealing under the ram? We are filled with fear and concern.
Also, we are actually biting our nails when Polyphemus prepares to throw the mountain peak at the ship. We are believing, “Oh My God It’s Going To Hit The Ship!” Then, when we get to the part when Polyphemus is available in, we are thinking, “Oh God this is not gon na end well.” Nevertheless, in the book, the escape of them men centers around Odysseus, showing his guile, nerve, management, and heroism, yet in the motion picture, the escape centers around Antiphous, the flutist and leader in the Trojan War. Thriller is integrated in both cases, however we never get to see Odysseus’s heroism in the motion picture.
Instead, we see guts as one of his men sacrifices himself to let his crewmen leave. When we enjoy the motion picture, we anticipate to see Odysseus be the last male to get away. Rather, we see him go out first. In conclusion, we do not have that much thriller when it comes to watching a film based on a book we have checked out. However, sitting by the fire, and reading a book in the middle of the night builds up more thriller for us than sitting in the theater viewing a film. Lots of believe that the film version of Book IX in The Odyssey is much better than he book.
After all, it’s much shorter, we can in fact get a visual, and we can simply relax and unwind while eating something. We even get a visual of our preferred character! It holds true that we can finish the movie in two hours however checking out the book would take a long time. However, the book is better than the movie in many methods. It explains things in abundant detail, it has gotten better evaluations for over 2000 years, and it is more interesting. In conclusion, and in my viewpoint, the book is much better than the movie.