Homer’s poem The Odyssey depicts the propensity of people to ignore the effects of their actions. Odysseus penalized Penelope’s suitors without thinking of consequences that he would need to sustain. He did not acknowledge the consequences because that would avoid him from doing what he wishes to do. Odysseus wished to eliminate the suitors; they ate away at his fortune. Discovering repercussions for murdering the suitors would force Odysseus to understand what he will do is not a good concept. Odysseus picked to overlook the effects and eliminated the suitors anyway.
Odysseus had absolutely no factor to eliminate the suitors; they had the right to stay in his house due to the fact that Penelope made them feel welcome, Penelope and Telemachus both told them that Odysseus was dead, and although Telemachus informed them to leave, he did not can do so. Throughout the poem, Penelope motivates the suitors to stay in her house by making them believe they are welcome. With Odysseus gone Penelope chooses whom she hosts in the excellent palace. Penelope does hate the suitors however she never ever once tells them to leave.
She even makes the suitors think that she would be picking her new hubby soon and in this method she makes them feel welcome in her house. Antinous, a suitor, responds to allegations Telemachus made to the suitors at an assembly. It’s not the suitors here who should have the blame, It’s your own dear mother [Penelope], the incomparable queen of cunning. Look here. For three years now, getting on to 4, she’s played it reckless with all our hearts, developing each guy’s hopes- dangling pledges, dropping tips to each- however all the while with something else in mind. 2. 94-100) Penelope makes each private suitor feel special and makes him think that she would select him as her new husband. This action implies not just that she allowed the suitors to stay in her home, but more notably that she desired the suitors to remain. Therefore, Penelope’s speech and actions towards the suitors justified their staying in the house. Statements made by Telemachus and Penelope about Odysseus’ whereabouts leads the suitors to think that he is deceased and, therefore, that Penelope is ingle and all set to court when again. When a lady is widowed, she begins trying to find a brand-new hubby and single males pertain to court the lady. Because Penelope and Telemachus tell the suitors that Odysseus is dead, the suitors have the right to remain and court Penelope. When talking to the suitors about weaving a shroud for Laertes, Penelope says,”?  King Odysseus disappears'” (2. 105). By telling the suitors that her other half is dead, Penelope insinuates that she is single as soon as again and trying to find a husband.
Telemachus likewise speaks to the suitors as if his daddy is deceased, informing them, “Now great Odysseus is dead?” (1. 454). In essence, Telemachus hands out his mom when he alerts the suitors of Odysseus’ supposed death. The death of Odysseus would suggest there is a requirement for a brand-new king of Ithaca. Penelope’s new spouse would become the brand-new king of Ithaca. Due to the fact that a king is very crucial to have, the suitors had the right to remain, not just for their own personal gain, however likewise for the well-being of the country.
Telemachus commands the suitors to leave, but the suitors do not have to obey him since he is not at liberty to make that decision. Penelope is the rightful owner of the family since of Odysseus’ lack. Therefore she decides which individuals may remain. Anyone else who lives in the house would not deserve to choose who is hosted or cast away. Telemachus, therefore, is not at liberty to make that choice. Telemachus’ authority to inform the suitors to leave is further weakened by his immaturity, as revealed by his propensity to resort to violence as a service instead of utilizing words.
At an assembly with Ithacan residents, Telemachus said “Oh I ‘d swing to assault if I had the power in me” (2. 67). Telemachus voices his desire for bloodshed just as a little kid presses or shoves others if they are angry with them. A kid’s first impulse in conflicts is to use force; they need to find out to utilize words instead. Telemachus uses violence just as a kid utilizes violence. An immature person is unable to make important decisions well. Immature people must not be enabled to make crucial choices due to the fact that they are so close-minded and unable to acknowledge other ideas.
Telemachus is still a child and has not developed enough to make such a heavy choice. Therefore, Telemachus can not manage the suitors’ actions since of his immaturity and his low quantity of authority. In The Odyssey, Odysseus acts impulsively in killing the suitors. He attacks and eliminates them without considering the effects for his actions. It is true that Odysseus wonders how he would deal with the parents and relatives of the suitors once they were dead, however those possible repercussions were insufficient to keep him from murdering Perin 4 he suitors. Odysseus understands what would happen to him if he kills the suitors, yet he kills them anyhow. Odysseus’ choosing to neglect the consequences for his actions is an example of selfishness and greed. Disregarding the repercussions allowed Odysseus to do what he wanted. If he had acknowledged them, he would not have actually killed the suitors. He was so set on getting back at them for their parasitism that he did not let anything get in his way. People today have the exact same problem as Odysseus did; they disregard the repercussions of their actions.
Overlooking repercussions gets individuals in trouble. Individuals need to think prior to they act; if there are serious repercussions to what they are about to do, they need to refrain from doing it, no matter how terrific whatever they are about to do appears. Homer shows the requirement for individuals to acknowledge the consequences to their actions through his informing of the story of Odysseus and the slaughter of the suitors. Works Pointed Out Homer. The Odyssey. Trans. Robert Fagles. New York: Penguin Books, 1996.