When a story is written in third individual point -of-view there are 3 different kinds of this narration that can be used. The very first is omniscient. This type of third person point-of-view is when the narrator has unlimited understanding, including all of the characters thoughts and feelings, and much more. The objective viewpoint is when the storyteller only has knowledge of what is in front of them. The narrator doesn’t understand what the characters believe, feel, or why they are doing the important things they are doing.
In limited viewpoint the narrator is only familiar with one character which characters thoughts, feelings, and environments.
In the story “Miss Brill” written by Katherine Mansfield the narrative is third individual point-of-view limited. The storyteller follows one character around for the totality of the story, Miss Brill. The reader remains familiar with just this one characters ideas, feelings, and environments for the entire story. I believe that limited point of view is appropriate for this story because it helps the reader understand why this woman goes to the park every Sunday and walks viewing individuals. If the story was written in 3rd person objective the reader would not have any insight regarding why this Miss Brill is at the park simply watching people.
The occasions that occur in this story can not be correctly explained through third individual objective point-of-view. If the story was composed in 3rd individual omniscient we would acquire insight about every character and what they were thinking and feeling. If this were how the story were composed we would simply be reading about a bunch of individuals who are at the park and what they are doing sensation and thinking, with not much purpose. The story was written in third person limited so that the reader might get an understanding of simply Miss Brill and her ideas and feelings.
In the story “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson the narration is in 3rd person point-of-view objective. The narrator discusses the characters but not their thoughts or sensations. This perspective is suitable for this story because the author desires the reader to be oblivious of what type of lottery is happening till the very end of the story. If the story was written in 3rd person omniscient the reader would get understanding of whatever each character was feeling and understand precisely what type of lottery game it was from the beginning. There would be no aspect of surprise and therefore would lose some of its thriller. If the story was composed in limited point-of-view the narrator would understand the ideas and sensations of one character of the story therefore still permitting the reader to determine what type of lottery it was. For these factors, third person objective is the best kind of narrative for this story.