“Personally, I disagree with their ideas.” One of the opening declarations of “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, this quote sums up the point of the text. Gilman becomes incensed at the method physicians and society view ladies. This narrative is an up-close account of a female who suffers from mental illness. It is written in a manner in which makes readers associate with the experience of gradually going bananas. An important element in the story is the reason for her aggravating condition; the storyteller associates it to the way her other half and brother stifle her and restrict her from composing and having stimulating pals visit. Through this female character, Gilman personally disagrees with the social expectations of the late 19th century. She asserts that females need to not be considered as physically or intellectually vulnerable, but instead should have the flexibility to take part in active pleasures like composing, reading, and academic conversation.
Though the narrator does end up being a growing number of mentally unstable throughout the story, her character is favorably presented. The tone of the writing is light and playful. Lots of exclamation points are utilized to convey her excitement, and enjoyable words constantly issue forth from her mouth like, “tasty garden,” “dear John,” and “blessed kid” (48 ). Her story is directed at the reader, so that the reader feels as if she has actually been included in an intriguing secret. She confides to us “I believe that female goes out in the daytime! And I’ll tell you why?privately?I have actually seen her” (53 ). Her demeanor is so pleasant that it is charming even in the middle of her madness. Its light and inviting nature practically encourage us that she is not really that lunatic. I think Gilman portrays her like this to comment that she is actually a typical, sane individual who is experiencing an oppressive environment. The text recommends that if she were allowed to do the important things that she wants to, like participate in “congenial work […] with excitement and change,” compose with less opposition, and be enabled “more society and stimulus,” (42) her fits of disease would probably disappear. The pleasant nature of the storyteller’s character is key in revealing Gilman’s desire to eliminate Nineteenth Century women of the obligation for their health problem by placing it on society’s repressive views of ladies.
The source of the narrator’s suppression is her doctor other half, which Gilman utilizes as a sign of larger society. This is why she describes her hubby (along with doctor bro) as guys of “high standing.” These guys are supposed to remind us of all males who are expertly educated and respected as authorities throughout this time. She recounts that she is encouraged to”take phosphates or phosphates, […] and tonics and air and exercise, and journeys, and am absolutely forbidden to? work’ till I am well once again” (42 ). The nature of this prescription for recovery is docile and passive. Upon close analysis, it seems that her partner most likely thinks that her extracurricular activities, like composing and talking about difficult information, has triggered her to end up being ill; this is based on his assumption that females are inherently weak and not able to withstand activities at the very same level as men can. The storyteller discusses that her partner is a physician and “perhaps that is one factor I do not get well quicker” (41 ). In other words, she thinks if her other half would simply let her be and allow her to try to support her mind in the way she senses is best, she would recover better. Gilman correlates the storyteller’s increasing misconception with her husband’s advice. When she asks for more stimulation, he states “the extremely worst thing [she] can do is to think about [her] condition” (42 ). Surprisingly, this triggers her to transition into her obsession with the yellow wallpaper. Her immediate reaction is: “So I will let it alone and discuss the house” (42 ). Undoubtedly, her partner’s advice is not effective, yet here, we see that it triggers much damage. Gilman takes care to build the novel in this way to state that the way larger society views and treats women’s problems is incorrect and very damaging. They must not hold the view that ladies are vulnerable and in requirement of delicate care. Most likely, she would more than happy to see women taking part in public conversation online forums, participating in recreational sports, and writing novels and short stories.
One reason the spouse has incorrect and harmful suggestions is that he refuses to listen to his partner’s thoughts and demands. On the other hand, he suppresses them. In the middle of the story, the storyteller’s physical health begins to improve and her other half is happy at this development. Nevertheless, she notifies him that she is “Better in body possibly–” However her husband condescends and rebukes her:
My darling […] I beg of you, for my sake and for our child’s sake, as well as for your own, that you will never for one immediate let that concept enter your mind! There is absolutely nothing so dangerous, so fascinating, to a personality like yours. It is a false and absurd fancy. Can you not trust me as a physician when I inform you so? (50 )
This quote shows that Gilman thinks that ladies will be healthier if their voices are allowed to speak and respected. She is alerting society that their way of handling women is causing them to be ill, and their method to treat this illness needs to be enhanced. She requires society to regard females as strong psychological and intellectual creatures who need to be allowed the very same flexibilities as guys. Therefore, she warms society that it better listen to the demands of its females prior to it is too late.
Gilman produces this interesting tale of a lady who slowly grows crazy so that readers can track the influence that her spouse’s suggestions plays in worsening her condition. She writes it in the first person so that readers can experience a piece of her circumstance and be drawn to care. All in all, “The Yellow Paper” is a story Gilman composes to deactivate society’s malfunctioning understanding that females are vulnerable and incapable of intellectual stimulation. She discreetly demands society to find another technique in seeing ladies, which in her view is strong, capable creatures who are entitled to innovative capacity through writing and stimulating discussion.