The Crucible Tone Paper
The Crucible tone Paper In Arthur Miller’s book/play The Crucible, the tone he adopts towards the subject of witch trials and witch hunts, and towards the characters that maintain them, is carefully composed. His paradoxical and negative tones throughout the play poke fun at the spiritual authorities doing what they believed was right, carrying out individuals they thought were witches. They also further the outlook on the lack of justice in an extreme, Puritan society. Miller continuously utilizes paradox in circumstances that led up to final accusations of witchcraft.
In the events leading up to Elizabeth’s conviction, she gets a poppet from Mary Warren with a needle in its stomach. When he discovered this, Cheever exclaims “I never ever necessitated to see such evidence of Hell …” This is ironic in the way that he was involved in the trials of convicting witches, and witches are proof of the Devil, and for that reason, proof of Hell. Another example of paradox remains in Act II when John Proctor hands Danforth a testimony that people had signed stating Rebecca Nurse, Martha Corey, and Elizabeth, good females.
Proctor said “… sir– they have actually understood the women several years and never saw no sign they had negotiations with the devil.” This testament was expected to help the women leave prison. It ultimately stopped working. A fantastic example of paradox is when Elizabeth Proctor lies about the affair that she understands that Abigail and John Proctor have. Judge Danforth asks her “Is your spouse a lecher?” Elizabeth answers “No, sir.” This shows that Elizabeth did not want to confess about the affair. She was confused of what to say sometimes since she kept turning to John for what to state.
I think that this example is paradoxical generally because it was said previously in the book that Elizabeth had never ever informed a lie, previously when she does lie about her John’s affair with Abigail. What is also ironic is the factor that this occasion occurred. The judges needed someone to inform them something about Proctor that they did not know while Proctor was on trial. When Danforth informs Parris to go get Elizabeth, he asks John if she is of trust. John informs Danforth that Elizabeth had never told a lie, that she could not tell a lie.
I think that this is paradoxical due to the fact that he said that Elizabeth could not tell a lie, and to his surprise, she did tell a lie, for him. The portrayals of Puritanism in The Crucible recommend qualities of stubbornness and their beliefs. An example of this is that the society of Salem likes to choose false religious worths over sensible presumptions. This is ironic because instead of listen to reasoning in their minds, they listen to the spiritual propaganda being shoved down their throats by Reverend Hale and Reverend Parris.
These men are thought about to be holy, and because they were holy, they were essentially immune from being implicated of witchcraft, as opposed to everybody else in Salem. For example, Reverend Hale mentions that “The man’s ordained; therefore the light of God is in him.” Hale is referring to Reverend Parris, who in his eyes, was permitted to be ignored as a victim of witchcraft because of his position in the religious society. He is said to be holy, but he is truly lacking in his religious obligations by declining to comfort the town when there was a turmoil about the witchcraft.
This is ironic because if everyone else can be accused of witchcraft, then they ought to be too. Everybody indicates everyone. Everybody doesn’t indicate everybody minus a few select individuals. If we wished to go over Miller’s mindset towards the Salem Witch Trials, we might seek to his words and see where his words reveal the ironic tone. His ironic tone throughout the book is consistent. This paradox proves to be what made it such a great book. Without the ironic under- and over-tones, you might hardly infer what he was actually attempting to state.