The Crucible– Setting Essay
Don Sinclair “The Setting that is most available to the reader is the one that is grounded in realism.” To what extent do you concur with this declaration? React with close recommendations to texts you have studied. The setting of Salem, Massachusetts in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible is a setting that is accessible and relevant to the reader, as it is grounded in realism. Although it is various from our society, it did when exist, and for that reason assists us comprehend what can take place in a worry based society.
The theocratic setting is grounded in realism and Miller utilizes this to warn us that history repeats it’s self, and may do so again, as similar events happened in America in the 1950’s. Miller utilizes Salem 1692 to show us a few of the implications of residing in a fear based society, like having a reputation. In a worry based society, nobody is instantly trusted, everyone is judged by their name. John Proctor has had a good name his whole life in the town of Salem.
Nevertheless when he knows that might prove Abigail is not as good as she appears, he is contrasted in between confessing that he had an affair with her and destroying his good name, or enjoying people he understands are innocent be founded guilty and keeping quiet. He does not want to “blacken” his name in the village. So he keeps the information to himself about the affair till it is too late, and nobody will think him because his name is no longer good. This shows that having a good name was so important in this society that you would risk your good friends being founded guilty of witchcraft to keep your name ‘white’.
Towards completion, when Proctor is about to admit to witchcraft, he declines to sign away his name “you have taken my soul, leave me my name!” He shouts, and from this we see there is nothing more vital to him. Likewise, Judge Danforth is focused on having a good name. We see this when he is not ready to delay John Proctor’s hanging. He knows that John might be innocent, however if he holds off the hanging, the village might question Danforth’s judgement. So Danforth would rather innocent individuals die, than the court’s, or his track record be put on the line.
From these 2 characters, we get a sense of just how much worth a name can hold. The setting is important in helping us comprehend this style. Miller wants us to comprehend that in the close, fear-based village of Salem your name has so much value and holds your whole track record. It should be kept ‘white’ as individuals make every decision about you based upon your name. It is outrageous occasions like this that happen in a worry based society. However Salem 1692 is grounded in realism, so we are forced to consider our own society, and what actions happen currently as an outcome of fear.
Take the Boston Marathon bombings for example. The U.S.A. lives in continuous danger of terrorist attacks so when a battle occurs, the majority of American’s and the rest of the world are quick to presume it was the doing of the Middle East, when in fact there is no proof at all to suggest that. Miller is encouraging us not to leap to conclusions in times of panic or discontent. In fear based societies, things frequently occur that we would now consider ludicrous, like suspicion being accepted as evidence, Miller uses a setting that is grounded in realism to show us this.
In Salem, 1692 individuals resided in constant fear of the devil, witchcraft and investing the afterlife in hell. Villagers were so scared of the power of the devil, and the horrors of witchcraft, that anybody who was acting with the tiniest suspicion, or remained in any way various, might be accused of being a witch. This is because they had no other description for the behaviour. This implied that individuals like Tituba (a black servant) and Goody Good (homeless woman) were quickly targeted and convicted by power starving Abigail. We saw this conviction with a lack of evidence with goody Osborne.
The evidence used to condemn her was that she did things like cause “a black cold” to climb up Mary’s back, and for her to have a stomach pains, and she mumbled. As “Witchcraft is ipsofacto … an undetectable criminal activity. For that reason who may perhaps be witness to it? The witch and the victim. None other.” The implicated witch’s word can not be trusted; for that reason Mary’s word is accepted as fact in the court. Another relatively ludicrous result of living in a worry based society is when Abigail and the girls’ hysteric responses to individuals are viewed as evidence.
Mr. Hale even admits that he has actually “Seen too many shocking evidence in court” revealing that he takes these responses as strong evidence and reason enough to hang. By using this setting with such strenuous values, expectations and worry of the devil, Miller reveals us how desperation can cloud judgement, and when worry and “typical vengeance composes the law” suspicion can be accepted as proof. We are more willing to accept what Miller is telling us here due to the fact that it is embeded in a realistic society that we see seriously.
Miller produces parallels to other occasions in history, and even now, to this genuine society from history to reveal us that history repeats. The Crucible occurs in a theocratic society, meaning that the bible is reality and law, individuals make every decision in life to please god and go to heaven after death. This naturally means that witches are genuine as the bible states “thou shalt not suffer a witch to live” thus the people of Salem genuinely think “the devil is loose in Salem”, and witches need to be demanded and eliminated.
The Crucible was written in the 1950’s, as an allegory for the events that were occurring in regards to communists in America. In the 1950’s individuals lived in consistent worry of communists– America was at war with the Soviet Union, so if someone was seen supporting communism, they were implicated of supporting the Soviet Union. The trials to convict communists required very little proof and were extremely unreasonable, it is only since individuals resided in consistent worry that these occasions might happen. Miller intentionally developed direct parallels to the 1950’s with 1692 Salem. Having actually the drama set in 1692 permits us to view the text more critically.
We are personally eliminated from it, and can therefore more voluntarily accept the ideas that Miller is attempting to convince us of. The text is a caution of the illogical things that come out of worry. By utilizing this genuine event in history, and developing parallels with America in the 1950’s, Miller desires us to acknowledge that we are not above these people, history simply repeats it’s self. We must have the ability to lean from the Salem witch hunt, and even 1950’s USA, however even today we still leap to conclusions in tense circumstances. The setting of this play is grounded in realism, it did really occur and the characters just represent humanity.
As soon as we acknowledge this, we see that all human beings can acting in this ridiculous way. In reality we still see this in today’s society in Guantanamo bay. As a result of terrorist acts versus the country, and the fear of more attacks the U. S armed force will interrogate, prosecute, serve as the defence council, be the judges in trials of individuals who are presumed to be terrorist (often by racist stereotypes, Muslim/Islamic guys). This offers possibly innocent individuals a hideously unfair trial and more verifies Miller’s point– That suspicion and allegation can be accepted as evidence in afraid situations.
We also see from this that the setting needs to be grounded in realism, by developing links in occasions that took place in that setting, to other events in history, we are forced to accept these concepts as true. Miller cautions us through the setting of theocratic Salem in 1692, an allegory for America in the 1950’s of the unreasonable actions that originate from afraid situations and extreme societies. These ideas are available and pertinent to the reader because the setting is grounded in realism.