Bias in To Eliminate a Mockingbird
The insidiousness nay of bias is that it is a found out behaviour propagated by ignorance and fear of the unidentified. Moreover, accepting and internalising bias fractures both people and communities. On the other hand, experiences of bias can result in a greater and more empathetic understanding of those who are marginalised in mainstream society. Harper Lee’s bildungsroman novel To Kill a Mockingbird (Mockingbird) exposes the heinous acts that individuals cause on others due to the holding of preconceived concepts and suggests that widespread prejudice destabilises social cohesion and irreconcilably harms the fabric of society. Lee likewise posits that the antidote to prejudice is reason and justice. Toni Morrison’s novel, The Bluest Eye (Eye) checks out the destructive impacts that are associated with society’s narrow meaning of appeal and the devastation wrought by the stultifying poverty that allures individuals due to the colour of their skin. Together both of these texts expose the damaging nature of prejudice on individuals and society and the need for justice and reason to fight this.
The blind approval of stiff social expectations legitimises and perpetuates harmful stereotypes. Lee uses village America in the 1930’s to light up the hazardous effects of narrow ideas about what makes up womanhood. These concepts are relayed through the character of Scout, a girl who’s innocent and optismic outlook on life conceals the truth that is manifesting within her household, community and within society. Lee’s characterisation of Scout subverts the standard ideas about being a Southern Lady, and this is revealed when Auntie Alexandra handles the function of teaching Scout how to be a correct Southern Bell that includes exemplifying great way and wearing quite dresses. Nevertheless, Scout saw this as “pink penitentiary” as she declined to comply with societies expectations of being a lady. The connection of the narrow definition of womanhood with a jail is paradoxical as jails are infamous for being dismal, helpless and dull whereas Scout views a jail as being overly feminine and wearing pink. Lee alludes to using gender stereotypes intended to assimilate ladies into a particular sector in society and magnifies the inherent risks that exist when this is so. As a result, gender bias has actually affected females as people which in turn create a damaged society.
Unlike Mockingbird, in which an African-American is maltreated by whites simply on the basis of skin colour, Eye presents a more complicated representation of racial bias. Although the characters do experience direct and tremendous injustice, more regularly they go through an internalized set of worths that generates its own cycle of victimization within families and neighborhoods bred from the narrow definitions of beauty based on binary opposition, that if white is thought about gorgeous then black is ugly. Her characterization of the Breedlove household who’s “ugliness originated from their conviction” explores the chaos that can stem from the societies overarching ideals of charm which straight ostracize a big quota in society. Utilizing an omnipresent narrator, Morrison looks into the inner most thoughts of Pecola Breedlove who first hand experiences the results of being an outcast particularly highlighted by the media’s representation of what was beautiful through ‘every billboard, every motion picture, every look’ continuously supporting the Breedlove’s concept that they were unsightly. Through this continue examination, Pecola wished that she herself was to be a child that had blue eyes, specifically buying candy with a “photo of Mary Jane”who is referred to as having a “smilling white face” and “blonde hair in a gentle chaos with blue eyes”. For Pecola “to eat the candy is to in some way consume the eyes. Eat Mary Jane. Love Mary Jane. Be Mary Jane”. In general, the internalisation of bias is profoundly destructive and can result in diabolic effects.
Whilst Morrison alludes of the threats connected with the internalization of prejudice she likewise extends this concept even more to acknowledge the socio financial prejudice experienced by the Breedlove household. “The Breedloves did not live there because they were having temporary trouble getting used to the lowerings at the plant. They lived there due to the fact that they were poor and black and they stayed there due to the fact that they believed they were unsightly”. “Although their hardship was conventional and stultifying, it was not unique!” Due to this powerful cycle they were denied an education, there were far less job opportunities and all of this was paved by the colour of their skin. Due to the selection of socio economic issues that originated from their “ugliness” and lowly living conditions, violence resulted within the family. The daddy, Cholly Breedlove had ugliness that was “a result of anguish, dissipation and violence directed towards petty things and weak individuals”.
In conclusion, these texts explore the destructive nature of bias and the extreme effect it has on both the specific and the broader society. The tremendous disaster of bias is that it is all frequently normalised in mainstream society and hence rarely confronted, questioned and exposed for the insidious illness it is. Additionally, it’s normalisation results in people internalising and blindly accepting what they have been informed and hence propagating the bias themselves. Where Lee utilizes the microcosm of Maycomb to show the significance of reason and justice in combating prejudice, Morrison presents the reader with a disastrous account of the dangers of internalising damaging folklore.