Of Mice and Male George Milton
In the 1900’s America was hit with the best financial failure the country has actually ever seen, called the Great Depression. This period in time sets the phase for the novella Of Mice and Guy by John Steinbeck. Through the main character George Milton, John shows his naturalistic ideals and belief in Determinism. A deeper take a look at the character, George Milton, brings forth his role as the protagonist in the book, his dream in the book and the purpose of his action in concerns to Lennie’s death. Just by reading the first couple of pages of the book it emerges that he plays the role of the protagonist in the novella.
It is almost indisputable that, anomalies aside, that George is Lennie’s protector and friend. He suggests no harm and he often acts with his friend’s disabilities and needs in mind. A prime example is the reality that George stays by Lennie even after saying, “if I was alone I could live so easy. I could go get a task an’ work, an’ no trouble. No mess at all …’ ‘An’ whatta I got,’ George went on furiously. ‘I got you! You can’t keep a task and you lose me ever’ job I get. Jus’ keep me shovin’ all over the nation all the time'”( 103 ).
One must keep in mind that George knows the benefits that leaving Lennie will bear and still stays by Lennie’s side. Also, George took offense to Slim’s comment about Lennie being a “cuckoo”( 39) and safeguards Lennie, playing the devil’s supporter and defending those who can’t defend themselves. Throughout the novella George’s dream becomes a point of controversy and concept. He wants to “live of the fat of the land” with Lennie. Throughout the book 4 men shared this dream other than George and Lennie, Sweet and Crooks were likewise fascinated.
However when things simplify it is a basic truth that George had the most to lose if things went awry and certainly they did. It was apparent that all 4 of the males were impacted negatively when the plan wound up awry, Sweet was even captured cursing at the idea of the dream disappearing. However, neither Crooks nor Candy were not exposed to the idea enough time to be genuinely disturbed. Although the dream was originally Lennie’s dream, George has taken such a preference to it he believed it himself, like lying so much you believe in the lie. This proves the significance of George’s dream and how it out weighs Candy’s or Scoundrel’s dream.
Lastly, we must evaluate the significance of George’s action at the end of the book. To do this we must look at Lennie’s death in a different light. When everything comes down, when George shot Lennie he was dong him a favor. While the idea of eliminating somebody as a favor to the victim is hard to understand, it becomes much clearer when we look at the scenario in a 3rd individual omniscient perspective. As the reader it is clear that when Curley get his hands on Lennie it was going to be a one sided blood bath and endless minuets of agonizing discomfort and suffering that will just end when Lennie bled to death.
On the other hand George shot Lennie in the head, it was over in less than a 2nd and Lennie faced much less pain than he would have if Curley got to him. Revealing that George was indeed warranted in his shooting of Lennie which he was actually doing a good deed in selecting the better of the 2 evils. All in all, when a reader takes a look at the character George Milton she or he should take a much deeper look at his function of the lead character, his dream and the significance of him shooting Lennie at the end of the book.
The whole book set’s George up as the good guy; George is to Lennie as Batman is to Gotham city. The disappointment and sorrow that he experiences exhibits Steinbeck’s naturalistic and deterministic suitables and the choice he made to shoot Lennie was in fact an act to save him. When taking a look at George, he really is like a mom because when the child is force to study, it frequently seems like a shot to the back of the head; nevertheless, she is conserving her Lennie(s) from doomed failure in life beyond school.