Of Mice And Men– American dream
Steinbeck in 1937, was derived from a poem ‘To a Mouse’ by Robert Burns. The novel is mostly set on a cattle ranch, portraying the life of the 2 lead characters, George and Lennie, and the shattering of their so-called A’American dreamA’– an intend to have their own little holding. George and Lennie are said to be an unlikely set. George is seen as the leader in between the two. He is A”little and quick, dark of face, with restless, eyes and sharp, strong featuresA”. He had A”little, strong hands, slim arms, and a thin bony noseA”  Lennie, on the other hand, had a lot of his choices produced him.
He was the overall reverse of George. He was A”a substantial male, shapeless of face, with large, pale eyes, with large, sloping shouldersA”  Lennie is a dreamer. He has a dream, which he is deeply committed to. As one of the most powerful characters in the novel, Lennie was capable to eliminate, and for that reason destroy GeorgeA’s dream. The book is told by a 3rd person omniscient, but Steinbeck tends to use dialogues in between George and Lennie, and hence assist the reader establish his/her viewpoint about each of the character as the story develops. The unique generally focuses on the landscape of Salinas.
In his design, Steinbeck likewise tends to use a lot of magery, specifically in the first and the last chapters of the novel. It is very fascinating how he uses his technique of significantly affective parallelism, making it almost comparable to a musical composition, duplicating the language and the setting of both chapters. Both, the opening and the last chapter, introduce the reader to the setting of the sight-the Salinas river. With the intensive use of images, Steinbeck once again, in the last chapter, utilizes particular details, such as the sycamore trees, the lizard, the raccoon and the deer, but most significantly, the snake.
In the opening chapter of the ovel, the snake is seen as the sign of peace, as it gradually swims, with its head holding up, but in the last chapter, A”the water snake glided smoothly up the swimming pool, twisting its periscope head from side to side; and it swam the length of the pool and came to the legs of a motionless heron that stood in the shallows. A silent head and the beak lanced down and plucked it out by the head, and the beak swallowed the little snake while its tail waved franticallyA” 
Steinbeck intentionally utilizes this concept of the snake, in order to foreshadow what will happen further on, when the unique ends. He also ses it to emphasize the threatening quality and the cruelty of the animal world. Now, the heron stands once again in the shadow, waiting till another snake goes by. Steinbeck likewise appears to utilize all the adjectives in the exact same order in the final chapter, the specific same order of the opening chapter, in order to develop this dramatically affective parallelism. SteinbeckA’s strategy includes a great deal of imagery, where animal imagery primarily dominates his design.
He utilizes this design affectively, in order to describe Lennie. Lennie is, in the opening chapter, said to walk greatly, A”dragging his feet a little, the was a bear drags his paws. His arms did not swing at his sides, however hung looselyA”  But as the climax of the book is reached, the murder he has dedicated and his fear now make Lennie walk A”quietly as a sneaking bear movesA”  He no longer A”drank with long gulps, snorting into the water like a horseA” , however A”hardly touching his hips to the waterA” 
It seems to be really affective; the way Steinbeck handles to produce these 2 chapters so similar to each other, however in reality makes an extreme change between them. Even the noise of a bird now triggers Lennie to jerk up his head. Lennie now sits on the bank. There is a change in his posture. He no longer imitates George similar to he did at the start A– A”George lay back on the sand and crossed his hands under his head, and Lennie mimicked him, raising his head to see whether he were doing it rightA”  George hesitates to scold Lennie.
Lennie asks George to tell him off. George does not seem able to do it, but goes on to the final informing of the story about the A’American dreamA’. This has, in a way, become a ritual. We are told that story a number of times throughout the novel. The truth how they will have their own A”steakA” with chickens nd other animals, as well as the rabbits, which Lennie will get to tend, and they will have money and go to a A”feline houseA”. George would also inform Lennie that there are no two other guys like them. They do not need anybody. No family, absolutely nothing.
They got each other. George finds in exceptionally challenging to tell Lennie about their dream at the end of the book. A”We got each other, thatA’s what, that offers a hoot in hell about U.S.A.” , Lennie sobbed in accomplishment. This is another among the examples of foreshadowing that Steinbeck uses, in order to stress the concept that if Lennie dies, they will no longer have each ther. Lennie once again, in the last chapter, just like at the start of the unique, tells George that if he doesnA’t desire him, he will increase into A”. go off in the hills anA’ find a caveA” 
He even informs him so in his fictional discussion with his aunt Clara. He once again mentions catsup. Auntie Clara guarantees Lennie that George appreciates him and that if he had catsup, he would give all of it to Lennie. ThatA’s how much he cares about him. However Lennie is petrified. He is terrified of what George would state when he learns bout CurleyA’s other half. First the mouse, then the young puppy, and now this. A”-AnA’ never ever have no ketchup-but I wonA’t care. If George donA’t desire meA … IA’ll disappear. IA’ll go away. A”  This remark maybe makes the reader have compassion for poor Lennie.
Even though he has devoted murder, he was not familiar with the truth that he would really do it, and this makes the reader pity him. At the near end of the unique, George takes his hat off and informs Lennie to the so too. However for what reason? We are not directly told. Possibly it is for a clear target, or possibly as a sign of regard? We are delegated make up our own conlusion. George has actually ended up being mean. A”You know people like us … A” heA ‘d state. The pressure from the society and the human sensation he has under this pressure make him totally give up on both Lennie and their dream.
He still sees Lennie as he used to in the past, however from a different viewpoint. He also feels sorry about what he will do, but understands that it is the ideal thing, due to the fact that is appears as the only hope in order to A’saveA’ Lennie. The closing chapter of the unique ‘Of Mice and Guys’ remains in a method an extra chapter to the novel, ending in a tragedy of their shattered dream, which they were so near to achieving. It emphases on the reality that the novel ends in a harsh manner. There is a lack of nderstanding and compassion.
We can tell this by the last sentence of the novel– A”Now what the hell ya suppose is eatinA’ them two people? A”  Life returns to normal after George has shot Lennie. This shows that the mankind does not seem to be thinking about a catastrophe of an individual. There is not empathy. This last sentence appears to have no justice, and makes the reader familiar with the truth how the world is unfair. Just like nature. It simply runs. Things often do not happen for any specific factor, they just are. Steinbeck senses that LennieA’s faith was simply another episode of the context of nature and faith.