Narration of The Yellow Wallpaper

Narrative of The Yellow Wallpaper

!.?. !? Generally, essays can be taken into 2 narration styles; first-person narrative and a third-person narration. An essay with a first-person narration is more individual due to the fact that it brings the readers truly near to the text in a sense that they learn more about the lead character’s direct thoughts and this is substantial as many lead characters are the main interest of a story. This essay will speak about how first-person narration in the story of The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkin Gillman is significant throughout the story.

In particular, this essay will take a look at how the narrative style gives power to a voiceless figure, concerns the result if this essay were written from John’s point of view and finally, elaborates more on the personal experience that readers will get since of it’s usage of the first-person narration. The primary character in The Yellow Wallpaper does not have a lot of verbal scripts of her own and she seems to be lacking her own identity in a sense that she simply follows anything that her husband recommends her to do, for instance when she says “I must put this away,– he hates to have me compose a word”.

This perhaps represents her powerlessness in the society’s eyes primarily because she is a lady. That being said, she is not exactly powerless considering that she still has control because she utilizes her words, ideas and expressions as means of power. For instance in the text, she mentions that “Personally, I disagree with their ideas. Personally, I think that congenial work, with enjoyment and modification would do me excellent”. The repetition of the word “personally” possibly suggests that she is trying to focus on the reality that everything that she writes is her real and own sensations.

The Yellow Wallpaper is also a postcolonial text where it voices out ideas of a margin figure in a society and in this case, it is the lead character who is a margin figure since of her gender and due to the fact that she is labeled as outrageous by her own hubby who is coincidently a physician (“… a physician of high standing, and one’s own husband, guarantees … that there is really absolutely nothing the matter with one but short-term nervous anxiety– a small hysterical tendency …”).

The fact that she has no say when it concerns her partner’s decision serves to communicate the weakness of a womanly figure in the social order in a sense that society has this frame of mind that males are supposed to be remarkable to females. However, the protagonist gains power through the audacity of her thoughts (“. She may not have much scripts of her own but when she starts writing, she appears so fearless and she is not fraid to say it all (“I would not state it to a person … but this is dead paper and a great relief to my mind”). This shows that by revealing her thoughts through writing, she provides herself a method of leaving from her suffering and it does her justice in a sense that the readers would understand that she still has a reasonable side and she also appears to have a hint on the important things that she wants in life.

It is relatively questionable of how different the story would be if it is to be written from John’s, the lead character’s hubby, viewpoint. There is a possibility that the text is going to be different because of the difference in terms if gender. As society labels males as superiors to women (Male Chauvinism), there are chances that the males themselves consider themselves as superiors also.

It could be that rather of depicting a story about a woman who is dealing with her life (“John does not understand just how much I truly suffer”) and is constrained from verbally voicing out a her own thoughts, it would be a story would maybe depend a lady who is traumatized after giving birth to her child and has actually considering that been depressed and gone ridiculous. This implies that the rational side of the lady would not be represented and the readers would maybe even concur that the woman’s mindset is just merely impacted.

This demonstrates how the viewpoint of her spouse would damage her identity in a manner that the readers would not be exposed to her real thoughts and feelings, just that she is a common other half is fairly useless because of her psychological health. Although potentially, “The Yellow Wallpaper” would still remain as a symbol to represent madness however in a slightly various approach as it would not have detailed descriptions of the woman in the yellow wallpaper due to the fact that the spouse would not be seeing it at all.

It might also be a story about a figure of a loving spouse that needs to bear with his outrageous other half everyday and the readers would then be more considerate towards the hubby, rather of the poor other half who is having a hard time to totally free herself from a mental disorder. It is very important for a story to bond to the readers so that it captures the reader’s interest to keep continuing to read it. Gilman’s use of first-person story keeps the readers close the protagonist and for this reason allows the readers to have a direct revelation of the lead characters’ sensations.

If this was not composed in a first-person narration, perhaps the readers would not know how the lead character is really “suffer [ing] and it would increase the ambiguity of the already ambiguous character which would maybe be less efficient in a sense that the readers would not be as much convinced when compared to be being in the protagonist’s shoes. With first individual narration, the readers would see the story through the storyteller’s eyes and they are more than likely to be able what she feels.

For example, when the protagonist’s mindset starts to diminish which is evident when she ends up being consumed with the “female” in the wallpaper and at the end she sort of sees “sneaking females” that she thought might came out from the wallpaper, the readers would discover this incredibly troubling since they get the visuals and graphic descriptions from the protagonist. This increases the readers’ empathies towards the protagonist and so they will link and possibly relate more to the ideas of the lead character.

In conclusion, Gilman’s choice of using first-person narrative is substantial since it works as a mean of power for the protagonist because she is unable to verbally mention her real sensations due to her position in the society where women are to be viewed as inferiors. It likewise stresses on the distinctions in regards to perspective in between man and woman and last but not least, the technique of utilizing first individual narrative truly ties the readers to the protagonist of the story which makes it actually efficient.

You Might Also Like