Lord Of The Flies: A Spiritual Allegory
Given that its publication in 1954, the Lord of the Flies has generated a prodigious cult-following for its blunt realities. Illustrating the savagery of marooned school boys, William Golding’s story presents a gruesome vision of post-war humanism in the mode of action and allegory. The Nobel Laureate’s unique appears to many critics a striking analogue to the Bible (in particular elements). Through its biblical parallels in settings, material, and overall meaning, Lord of the Flies ends up being, in essence, a spiritual allegory.
The virtual framework of the novel provides the basis of this scriptural corollary. Embed in a dense jungle, the fiction produces an ambiance akin to the Garden of Eden. “A fantastic platform of pink granite thrust up uncompromisingly through the forest and terrace and sand and lagoon […] The palms that […] stood made a green roof, covered on the underside with a quivering tangle of reflections from the lagoon.” (Golden 11) The lush charm of the island is equivalent to that of Genesis’ Eden. “And the Lord God planted a garden in Eden, in the east […] And out of the ground the Lord God made to grow every tree that is enjoyable to the sight and helpful for food …” (Gen. 2:8 -9).
Innocence within the Garden of Eden and the Lord of the Flies is shown likewise through the characters’ undressed pleasure; both stories show an essential naÐ ¿ vetÐ ¹ and carelessness in the unclothed states of their players. Genesis supplies a symbolic view of nakedness as the state before knowledge and sin. “And the male and his better half were both naked, and were not embarrassed.” (Gen. 2:25) Lord of the Flies’ Ralph, in a minute of childish wonderment, strips off his clothes and streaks towards the clear, blue sea.
The instinctual and younger immediate ends after Ralph dutifully shepherds the others towards a meeting. Ralph reveals shrewd in his shallow use of democracy, fairly encouraging the young boys of his power; the action shows a significant go back to understanding after innocence. (Golden 16-22) Acts of understanding cause sin in the unique and power struggles, a vision of knowledge, stimulate adjustment and murder. Golden’s unique morally parallels the Bible through the concept that understanding declares immorality.
Along with the text’s concept of sin, critics most extensively acknowledge Simon’s similarities to Jesus. “Simon is a tranquil lad who attempts to reveal the young boys that there is no monster on the island except the worries that the young boys have.” (Houston np) Christ’s life appears a series of lovely and regrettable happenstances that ultimately lead to his death. He is the essential goodness that Simon represents in the book. Simon, typically alone, is the purest of the young boys. He is the most helpful and giving. “Simon discovered for them the fruit they might not reach, managed the choicest from up in the foliage, passed them pull back to the limitless, outstretched hands.” (Golding 56) He is likewise the only one that comprehends. He tries to state the truth, however to no get; in his hesitancy he is overcome by the kids.
“Perhaps,” he [Simon] stated reluctantly, “maybe there is a beast.”
The assembly cried out savagely and Ralph stood in awe.
“You, Simon? You believe in this?”
“I don’t know,” stated Simon. His heart beats were choking him. “However …”
The storm broke.
“Sit down!” “Stop talking!” “Take the conch!” “Sod you!” “Shut up!”
“Hear him! He’s got the conch!”
“What I indicate is … perhaps it’s just us.”
Simon ended up being inarticulate in his effort to express
humanity’s vital health problem. (Golden 80)
“When he makes this discovery, he is mocked. This is an astonishing parallel to the misconception that Christ needed to deal with throughout his life.” (Houston np)
Later on, we understand the depth of Simon’s understanding in his discussion with the Lord of the Flies. The interview is an apparent allusion to Jesus’ conversation with the Devil throughout his forty days and forty nights in the desert. “Lord of the Flies” is in fact a direct translation of the Greek word Beelzebub.
“Fancy thinking the Monster was something you could hunt and eliminate! […] You understood didn’t you? I belong of you? Close, close, close! I’m the reason why it’s no go? Why things are what they are? […] I’m warning you. I’m going to get mad. D’you see? You’re not wanted. Comprehend? We are going to have fun on this island. Comprehend? We are going to have a good time on this island!” (Golden 130-131)
The Lord of the Flies’ speech pattern makes it appear even more devilish and threatening to Simon. In a panic, he endeavors towards the young boys attempting to reveal the reality of the Beast however, he is overcome by the mob and eliminated as the “Beast”. (Golden 138-139) At this point, the parallel between Jesus Christ and Simon is obvious. They are the messengers of fact killed for their beliefs; although Simon is killed prior to conveying the fact while Christ was eliminated for doing so. The paradox of both circumstances is that these deaths ultimately lead to salvation. Christ’s death represented the opening of the heavens; previously the dead remained in limbo. Simon’s death shocks Ralph into “negotiation” endeavor with Jack. Unfortunately, the Ralph’s attempt at a writing leads to the destruction of half of the jungle, which in turn brings rescue. (Golden 155-184).
The parallels between Christ and Simon symbolize a typical belief in redemption. The Christian doctrine holds firm that salvation will come and Golden’s scarce optimism correlates with this belief. Through this, religious allegory in Lord of the Flies is apparent.
Golden’s use of religious allegory is apparent in his seriously acclaimed unique Lord of the Flies. In congruence with numerous biblical settings and themes, the unique communicates 2 significant scriptural beliefs; Adam and Eve’s loss of innocence due to understanding and the firm faith that salvation will come. William Golden reveals this through comparable use of characterization between Christ and Simon and the Garden of Eden like setting.
Bible.Com. Gen. 8-25. 15 Mar. 2006.
Golding, William. Lord of the Flies. 13th ed. The Putnam Group, 1954. 7-184.
Pujante, Juan J., and Juan J. P. “Golding’s Styles.” Homepage of Juan Javier Herraiz Pujante. 1995. U of Virginia. 15 Mar. 2006.