Letter From Birmingham Prison
The general point that Martin Luther King is making in the letter is that in order for civil liberties to be accomplished, the act of non-violent protests must be permitted. King thought that if non-violent techniques were prohibited then stress would keep building up, and would result people being far more violent in order to let their viewpoints be heard. King also thought that there was no much better time than that moment to fight for their rights, rather than putting it off until a ‘more convenient season’ (line 12).
He thought that they would use all the time they needed to defend their liberty and put across what they think in rather of just awaiting time to pass, hoping that change will happen naturally. 2. The restoration of paragraph 2 (lines 17-29) is as follows: (P. L) Slamming serene actions due to the fact that they set off violence is like slamming someone who has been robbed since his ownership of valuable items triggered the break-in, or like slamming Jesus because his allegiance to God set off the crucifixion. (P. 2)– Society should secure the robbed and penalize the robber.
C)– It is wrong to stop individuals from utilizing non-violent accusations because violence might follow. This argument supports Kings see that non-violent techniques of protest ought to not be prevented. The use of the contrast to relatable examples such as the robber makes the argument more easily comprehended by the reader, and is a good way to attempt to convince the reader to support King’s views. Similarly, making use of Jesus as an example would attract the reader as a lot of them would have had a religious background, and this would have made them more likely to concur with Kings argument.
By utilizing French and Raven’s taxonomy have determined that the type of authority being attracted is coercive power. This is because the clergymen have the ability to punish King and the other protesters for their actions. The black individuals are likewise being punished by not having standard human rights. This power will be used by the clergymen in the hope that punishment will discourage the protesters from showing again. Another type of authority being attracted might be genuine power as the letter was modified by Reverend Wyatt Walker, who was a national civil rights leader and historian.
This might lead on to being an interest proficiency as both Martin Luther King and Reverend Wyatt Walker are professionals in human rights. Due to the reality that the argument is an interest proficiency, we can utilize Tinsel’s critical concerns to examine the quality of the argument. However, the very first critical concern states that the specialist need to be identified, and since neither the Reverend nor King are recognized in the argument, the appeal can be considered fallacious. In regards to authenticity I think that the appeal is of a great quality. 2 crucial concerns that could be asked are ‘is the power in concern legitimate? And ‘is the person in a session to exercise that power at that minute in time? To which I would answer, the power in question is legitimate as he (Reverend Wyatt Walker) had a degree in history and had been the leader of several civil rights groups. This implies that he is well informed on the topic of civil rights and will be able to put across his view in a well arranged and helpful way so more people are likely to think and concur with his argument. The important concerns to show the quality of coerciveness could be ‘Can the person legally offer the punishment?, ‘Are they likely to supply the penalty?