Curley’s Partner in Of Mice and Guy
In the unique, “Of Mice and Male,” the author, John Steinbeck bases the book on personal experiences of his own. Steinbeck grew up and dealt with a cattle ranch in Soledad near where the book is set. Throughout the Great Depression, Steinbeck encountered numerous migrant employees and discovered of the everyday challenges cattle ranch employees needed to face. In this period, generally all migrants were dependent on their dreams and individual requirements to survive in a time of total seclusion and poverty. Steinbeck utilized his personal experiences greatly to represent the characters on the cattle ranch. The title ‘Of Mice and Guys’ was chosen from a poem by Scottish poet Robert Burns, the poem sums up how the very best set out schemes do not always prevail. This is greatly interlinked with the unique when George, Lennie and even Curleys’ other half’s dreams never ever come to fulfillment. John Steinbeck wrote Of Mice and Male in order to express his social views about America in the 1930’s, focusing throughout the book on the styles of the predatory nature of human existence, the solitude and the desire for friendship and finally the impossibility of the American dream (America’s ethos that with effort your dreams can come true). The characters utilized in the unique help represent every level of society and Curley’s wife is an important part of the novel as she represents all the main themes in the book.
We first acknowledge Curley’s better half when the workers on the cattle ranch offer their opinion of her to George and Lennie. The employees perceive her as “jailbait” and “tart.” In addition she is accused of dressing like a “slut”, affirming she is open to revealing herself to others, highly showing her desperation to be observed. Lennie and George then satisfy Curley’s other half and Lennie is mesmerised by her features. George quickly understands Lennie’s fascination with her, and warns Lennie to stay away from her as “shes gon na make a mess”; this foreshadows the ending, as she shatters George and Lennie’s dreams.
Her physical appearance of ‘full, rouged lips and wide-spaced eyes, heavily made- up’, more assistance our presumptions of her. Red, the colour of her makeup and the way she provides herself suggests some sexuality. Likewise, she utilizes evocative and amorous body language, ‘she put her hands behind her back and raided the door frame so that her body was tossed forward”. She both talks and acts playfully with the other ranch workers. She behaves in this manner because her sexuality is her only weapon to gain attention, which she yearns for due to the solitude of her marriage. She likewise overcomes her insecurity by covering herself up through the way she expresses herself openly, masking her real identity and emotions. Some would argue though, she feels empowerment when she is the centre of attention, which in turn enhances her self-confidence and her sense of presence assisting her feel her life has a sense of purpose.
In the later stages of the unique, Curley’s other half finally starts to open herself up. She begins speaking, “in a passion of interaction,” to Lennie. This part of the novel shows her humankind and reveals the reader she has her own aspirations. We see an ignorant technique and mindset towards her dream, “I coulda made something of myself”. She refuses to accept her dream has no opportunity of occurring as she states ‘perhaps I will yet.'” Curley’s spouse uses her dream as an escape from her loveless marriage and miserable life; she is misguided that her dream may come to strategy and hopes she can still have a much better life. Curley’s spouse also blames others for the failure of her goals, especially her mother, “‘My ol’ woman wouldn’t let me If I ‘d went I wouldn’t be livin’ like this you wager.'” Eventually, Curley’s wife’s dream focuses on what her life might have been and what she still plans it to be. She fantasises of what her dream would offer her if it were to come real. The truth that Curley’s other half wants always contain a link to men, highlights the male dominated society in which she resides and her dependence upon them as a lady expecting a much better life. As she speaks to Lennie, she hurries through what she needs to say, “before her listener could be taken away,” really revealing her desperation for interaction and friendship. In general, her flirty attitude can be viewed as her way of keeping a form of interaction and coping with the reality that her imagine being an actress will never ever come true. She symbolises the reflection of the American Dream in turmoil at the time of the Great Anxiety, where everybody’s dreams of a much better life never concerned truth, including George and Lennie’s.
In the unique, Curley is continuously questioning where his other half is, recommending to us that their relationship has trust issues. On the other hand, the fact Curley’s wife is not provided a name suggests that Curley sees her as a possession, and shows how women were oppressed during the post contemporary period. With a dull relationship with her hubby and as the only lady on the ranch, her life is lonely. We see her loneliness when she wanders throughout a few of the men. She says, “What am I doin’? Standin’ here talkin’ to a bunch of bindle stiffs since they ain’t nobody else.” Everybody on the cattle ranch sees her as trouble, even her hubby. She is seen as always searching for difficulty and flirting with the guys on the cattle ranch, “Well she got the eye”, this makes the other ranch workers wary of her, as they do not want to anger Curley due to his status on the ranch. This results in fast and unjust judgments of her character when in fact she just wants someone to talk with as an outcome of her seclusion on the ranch.She is very misinterpreted and this contributes extensively to why she is done not like on the farm.
In area 4 of the unique, Curley’s partner gets in Scoundrel’s space and displays a vicious and authoritative figure. As she gets in the space, she right away attacks Lennie, Crooks and Sweet, “They left all the weak ones here”. She then laughs up the idea of George and Lennie’s dream, before reacting to Crooks demand of her leaving the space by informing him “I could get you strung up to a tree so easy.” The word “weak” is closely associated to the scene as Curley’s partner callous and threatening behavior highlights the bleak and severe nature of society where the weak attacks the weaker. In a better world, Crooks, Lennie, and even Curley’s partner’s distinctions for which society considers them inferior, would bring them together. On the cattle ranch, however, they are opposed versus each other. Curley’s spouse shows severe vulnerability in this area of the novel, willingly confessing her solitude and unhappy marital relationship. In truth she is as pitiful as the men who sit prior to her, as she looks for the sources of their weak point and enjoys raising herself by putting others down. Steinbeck cleverly strengthens the power of the Jim Crow laws in this section too. We see the psychological impacts the laws on a coloured male and the complete power whites had during that age. Curley’s better half threatens Crooks life and there is nothing he can do about it, stressing the unfairness of society in that generation also we see Curley’s Other half manipulative side as she utilizes anything she can get to her benefit.
In the last scenes of the novel Lennie is sat regretfully pondering the repercussions he will face as penalty to the death of a pup, which is on his hands. Curley’s partner quickly appears and demands talking with Lennie, this takes place to Lennie rubbing her hair, which results in the damage of all of Lennie’s dreams and Curley’s partner’s death. In the composing after her death Steinbeck places a procedure of blame on Curely’s Better half for her own death. She tempts Lennie into touching her hair, this might be interpreted as a sexual advance. In addition, she puts the deal forward by suffering isolation and frustration in her marital relationship. Nevertheless sincere these complaints may be, her seductive figure in the scene results in her death. She is not able to collar the danger and vicious power of Lennie despite the evidence of her husband’s disfigured hand. She rather perceives his dispute with her other half as simply her hubby’s competitor and a harmless admire. Thus she ‘leads him on’. Continuing, Steinbeck explains Curley’s Other half as having more life and charm after her death, “the meanness and the plannings. and the ache for attention were all gone from her face”. Steinbeck’s description of Curley’s spouse’s remains is that in death she lastly found her peace but only when the trials and tribulations of living in an anti feminist society were devoid of her soul did we then begin to see her inner charm. The last time we experience her remains we can completely understand the anti feminist representation of Curley’s other half stressed by the ranch workers. As she lays motionless in the barn, Candy starts cursing at her dead body, calling her a, “tart,” and a, “tramp.” Even her own other half fails to distress in her death and is seen absolutely nothing more than a scapegoat by George and Sweet. Steinbeck illustrates perfectly the atmosphere of abuse and disregard that possibly led her to misbehave in the first location. Throughout the unique, and even in her death she was never considered as a person, just as Curley’s possession.
This interesting and emotive story is an authentic reflection of American society painted by Steinbeck, who wrote this unique in 1937. During this time America was facing its 2nd economical economic crisis in 8 years triggering the population to lose full self-confidence in its healing. The story of Curley’s Wife and the other main characters assist represent a microcosm of society in the ranch, each specific character helps represent different groups of society. Scoundrels depicting the effects of bigotry, Lennie residing in a world not fit for the mentally impaired and Curley’s spouse showing females Oppression.Overall Steinbeck concepts and concepts including women are expressed through Curley’s other half. The story provides a bleak view of the inspirations behind the actions of mankind, which is supported by Curley’s partner’s behaviour towards others in the story. As all characters have their hopes and goals eliminated from them it can be seen as Steinbeck analysis of the overwhelming and gloomy sensation of an American society in doubt of ever seeing a much better future and life. Throughout the unique, the other ranch workers present her as a tramp and a temptress, constantly wanting to cause some problem. Although the point has some credibility as Steinbeck when composed, “she is a good girl and not a floozy.” She was a kind-hearted lady who had been maltreated all her life in addition to constant negative life experiences including her dream being crushed which contributed mainly to how she acted throughout the book.