The Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger must not be prohibited in schools based exclusively on the reality that it is a controversial book that utilizes extreme language and sexual referrals. This book is J. D. Salinger’s liberty of speech, and it is a violation of the first amendment for schools to prohibit this book. This book is only using an inside check out what teens go through in some point of their lives.
According to the Los Angeles Times, The Catcher in the Rye’s, “… blasphemy and sexual recommendations drew scandalized reactions …” (Rotella 18).
Although this book has lots of sexual recommendations, it is not in any method as explicit and as bad as what teenagers see and hear nowadays on television and in the world. Holden occasionally thinks and discusses sex: “Most people at Pencey talked about having sexual intercourse with ladies all the time.” (Salinger 48).
The average teenager frequently believes and discusses sex. It is not uncommon for teens to do this.
The profanity in this book is likewise not as bad as it may appear. Patty Salazar, a worried mom and religious activist, claims that, “‘It uses the Lord’s name in vain 200 times'” (Rotella 17), however menstruation words used in The Catcher in the Rye are nothing that teens have not heard before in their everyday lives. Banning The Catcher in the Rye in school is not acceptable.
It is an infraction of the very first change, and it is nothing far from what teens encounter everyday. This book offers teens someone in literature that they are able to associate with in one method or another. The Catcher in the Rye is not a book that will corrupt young readers. The hidden style of this book is loss of innocence. This loss happens when a teenager makes the modification to their adult years where she or he is obscured by phoniness. By prohibiting this book from schools, the only thing that teenagers would be protected from is truth.
You may also have an interest in the following: phoniness in catcher in the rye