StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Legal Case Briefs x 3 ( Terry v. Ohio, Katz v. United States, Tennessee v Garner) - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Name of student Course code Instructor Date due Case Briefs 1. CASE TITLE: TERRY V OHIO. CITATION: 392 U.S.1 (1968) FACTS Mr Mc Fadden, a Cleveland detective on duty observed two unknown men Terry and Chilton on a street corner. He noticed that the two men were observing a store window which they walked past roughly 24 times with the two men meeting on completion of each walk…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful
Legal Case Briefs x 3 ( Terry v. Ohio, Katz v. United States, Tennessee v Garner)
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Legal Case Briefs x 3 ( Terry v. Ohio, Katz v. United States, Tennessee v Garner)"

Download file to see previous pages

The three men were incoherent in their response. That prompted the detective to accost Terry, turn him around and discovered a pistol which he was not able to seize at the moment. He then made the three men to enter the store hands raised, and then frisked Chilton and Kartz. The detective recovered a .38 calibre revolver from the pocket of Chilton’s overcoat on the outside. He did not search the outer clothing of Kartz because he did not suspect him to be armed when he lightly frisked him. The detective as a result of discovery of the weapons arrested the three and charged Terry and Chilton with carrying concealed weapons under Ohio laws and rules.

Procedural history Trial court- passed verdict of guilty and convicted. Court of appeal – affirmed conviction. Supreme court- upheld affirmation of appellate court. Issue Admissibility of evidence obtained from suspects without warrants under the fourth amendment if the hunt was restrained /limited and reasonable grounds to suspect danger depending on the prevailing circumstances before actual proof is obtained. Holding It was proper to stop and frisk the suspects if the police had reasonable grounds of suspicion and it was not contrary to the fourth amendment of unreasonable searches and seizures and that the rule was applicable both privately and in public places.

Reasoning Brinegar v. United States 338 U.S. 160 (1949) In as much as probable cause standards are meant to guard citizens against unlawful interference by law enforcement officers, they are also meant to aid law enforcement. A balance has to be struck between allowing the officers too much discretion and what is reasonably practicable under the prevailing circumstances. Application Even though the law provides protection for individuals and guards privacy under the fourth amendment, it must be understood that circumstances arise where it is reasonably practicable to allow personal intrusion for effective law enforcement.

The standards of probable cause must be regarded in determination of whether arrests without warrants are constitutional or not. Conclusion Activities by law enforcement officers that may seem to be a infringement of the Fourth Amendment in relation to searches and seizures depends on the prevailing circumstances under which the events occur and the reasonableness of actions taken by the law enforcement officers. In order to enhance community protection, law enforcement officers must be allowed certain powers but only which are necessary and not excessive. 2. CASE TITLE: Tennessee v Garner CITATION: 471 U.S.1 (1985) Facts Two Memphis police officers, Wright and Hymon responded to a call October 3, 1974 at a quarter to 11 pm.

On arrival at the scene, a woman gestured at the next house and explained to them that she had heard the sound of breaking glass and that it was probably a house break in the neighbour’s house. Hymon positioned himself behind the house as Wright confirmed their presence at the scene to the dispatch scene by radio call. Hyman first heard the sound of a slamming door and saw the suspect fleeing across the backyard. The suspect made a stop at a 6-feet- tall chain link fence. Hyman by the aid of a flashlight could see the suspect and reasonably concluded that he was unarmed, about 17/18 years old and about 5’5’’ or 5’7’’ tall.

Hyman called on him to stop but he proceeded to scale the fence.

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Legal Case Briefs x 3 ( Terry v. Ohio, Katz v. United States, Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1458617-legal-case-briefs-x
(Legal Case Briefs X 3 ( Terry V. Ohio, Katz V. United States, Essay)
https://studentshare.org/law/1458617-legal-case-briefs-x.
“Legal Case Briefs X 3 ( Terry V. Ohio, Katz V. United States, Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1458617-legal-case-briefs-x.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Legal Case Briefs x 3 ( Terry v. Ohio, Katz v. United States, Tennessee v Garner)

Brief The Case Of State V. Stark

The case Study "Brief The case Of State V.... The Washington Court of Appeals asserted and remitted the case for commutation.... Brief The case Of State V.... The Washington Court of Appeals asserted and remitted the case for commutation.... art cCourt's DecisionThe court asserted defendant's condemnations for three counts of second-degree assault, but remitted the case for commutation on count one....
3 Pages (750 words) Case Study

United States v. Wade

united states v.... “united states v.... “united states v.... “The united State v.... The Supreme Court however, did not find any reason to dismiss the case against Wade.... Therefore, it was the opinion of the court that the Fifth Amendment Right to self incrimination was not violated in this case as the line up identification did not show that there was any testimonial or communicative evidence that needed to be suppressed....
4 Pages (1000 words) Case Study

United States v. Salerno

united states v.... hellip; united states v.... Supreme Court (“united states v.... The 8th Amendment of the united states Constitution, which is based upon the English Bill of Rights, prohibits the application of excessive bail or fines, including cruel and unusual punishments.... united states v.... om/blog/law/criminal-procedure/criminal-procedure-keyed- to-israel/pretrial-release/united-states-v-salerno-2/ N....
2 Pages (500 words) Case Study

Shepard v. United States

the united states,” the author discusses the case of Major Charles A Shepard of the united states Army, who was convicted of murdering his wife Zenana Shepard at Fort Riley Kansas.... The initial judgment was declared through the united states District Court.... hellip; The author states that the motive seemed to be that Major Shepard was in love with another woman and wanted to make to be with this woman.... The nurse then states that Mrs....
2 Pages (500 words) Case Study

U.S. Supreme Court Case Tennessee vs. Garner

However, the united states Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, while responding to an appeal by the appellee-respondent, reversed, stating that the use of force against a fleeing suspect in pursuance of the requirements of the Fourth Amendment is subject to be qualified in the light of the criteria of reasonableness (Findlaw, 2008).... garner Various socio-legal institutions including the courts and the police are often expected to give expression to the collective conscience of the society....
3 Pages (750 words) Case Study

Terry V Ohio case

In this paper “terry v ohio case” the author examines the case which was brought to the US Supreme Court in which they decided that unreasonable searches were not against the 4 Amendment when this act was carried out by a police officer who felt it his responsibility to check a suspicious individual.... hellip; According to the author, the terry v ohio case took place when a police officer stopped and checked three men because of their suspicious behavior....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Wolf v. Colorado & Terry v. Ohio Case

When a court is faced with a case deemed as a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the united states Constitution and State law through search and seizure by police of individuals,when deciding whether they crossed the federal constitutional line;the united states Supreme Court… takes into consideration state search and seizure practices at the time of the Fourth Amendment's enactment and current state practices.... 25 When a court is faced with a case deemed as a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the united states Constitution and State law through search and seizure by police of individuals,when deciding whether they crossed the federal constitutional line;the united states Supreme Court takes into consideration state search and seizure practices at the time of the Fourth Amendment's enactment and current state practices....
2 Pages (500 words) Case Study

Tennessee V. Garner 1985 and Making of a New Force

Thereby they are responsible and prosecutable for any deliberate or impulsive or situational action taken against any individual without consideration of the provisions of the law of civilian rights in the united states of America.... The incident was thus described as Edward garner, an apparently unarmed felon, tried to flee the crime spot and a police officer, Elton Hymon chasing him, shot him in the back of his head while he was trying to climb over a 6-feet-high fence in order to elude the arrest; and as a result, the victim died during a surgical operation at a hospital....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us